The first UX Camp Vancouver was organized by Karen Parker from Burntsand and David Drucker, a seasoned UI Consultant. The event was held at the Vancouver Film School on December 5th and it was attended by over 100 participants. In the spirit of the 2.0 community, the “unconference” camp was free with pre-registration as the only requirement.
The morning started with two key speakers, Amanda Gibbs and Elizabeth Snowdon. Amanda is the director of audience engagement from the Museum of Vancouver and she gave a talk on “Rethinking Museum Spaces”. Elizabeth Snowdon works at Sage Software as a Senior Usability Analyst and she presented Remote Usability Testing. Both talks were held at the same time and I wished that I could have been in both places at once. As Elizabeth is my sister, I had no choice except to attend her presentation; she has posted it on slideshare at http://www.slideshare.net/esnowdon/remote-usability-testing-2702925.
In 2003, Elizabeth began remote usability testing at PMC Sierra, a manufacturer of semi-conductor chips located in the Vancouver area. She continues today at Sage Accpac, another local company that specializes in end-to-end operational and accounting software. Elizabeth emphasizes that remote tests are cost-effective solutions that can be done easily from any location with internet connection. Her last usability test on 24 international participants at Accpac have saved the company at least $50, 000 as compared to a traditional lab environment.
Two discussion panels followed, one was “User Research” and the other one was “Tools of the Trade.” I was torn again as I wanted to see both….ended up attending the talk given by Karen Parker and Karyn Zuidinga from Analytic Design Group. The discussion panel looked at the various type of studies used in User Research, sample size and the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative versus qualitative studies.
We took a short lunch break and met again at 1 for a half hour jam session for the afternoon’s talk. As the usability community is no exception to the 2.0 community, attendees were invited to present on topics. 13 out of the 15 available slots were filled. Jocelyn Smith from Group Analytics managed to convinced me to talk about bio-medical device and usability example. With our combined backgrounds, we talked about a real consumer device to test blood glucose level and how it could be designed to be more user-centric. Jocelyn was well experienced with this topic and she made it easy to present. Some of the other talks that afternoon included: People & Projects / Learning from the Games Industry, Information Architecture for Intranets, Startup Speed-Dating, Getting Away from “Big Design Up Front” / Agile Usability Information Architecture Labelling Devices, Designing Cutting Edge Web Trends Cartoons; Customers , People Circles, Getting messages across to the uninformed, Improv for Usability, Roleplaying for dummies, Requirements in Second Life and UX Crash Course.
At 4:15, we had a 15 minute wrap up of the day’s event. I really enjoyed myself and hope that the event will take place again next year.